Factors Shifting Preference Toward Telemedicine in the Delivery of Skin Cancer Reconstruction Care.

OBJECTIVES: Identify which delivery modality for skin reconstruction care, face-to-face (FTF) in-person versus two telemedicine modalities, store-and-forward (S&F) and live video chat (LVC), is patient preferred and how cost, access, wait time, and demographics influence this preference. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A 16-question survey querying demographics and five scenario-specific preferences questions for the delivery of skin cancer reconstruction care was created and distributed via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), a crowdsourcing online marketplace, and in-person to Mohs micrographic surgery patients. RESULTS: 1394 MTurk and 55 in-person responses were included. While 82.1% of online respondents prefer FTF clinic visits, this decreases to 58.3% with an in-person visit cost (p < 0.01) and furthermore to a minority 43.5% with both an in-person visit cost and wait time (p < 0.01) despite 77.8% believing that usefulness to the surgeon would improve FTF. Both the MTurk and in-person cohorts demonstrated similar response patterns despite considerable demographic differences. Multivariable analyses revealed that telemedicine was preferred by MTurk respondents with Medicaid (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.97 [1.18-3.31]) or Medicare (1.69 [1.10-2.59]) versus private insurance, and prior skin cancer (2.01 [1.18-3.42]) and less preferred by those earning $140,000+ per year (0.49 [0.29-0.82]) compared to those earning <$20,000 per year. CONCLUSIONS: FTF visits are preferred for skin cancer reconstruction care; this shifts toward virtual care with a cost and wait time in spite of the perceived quality of care. Individuals with socioeconomic barriers to access prefer telemedicine. MTurk can be a valuable tool for behavioral research in FPRS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 133:294-301, 2023.

Cheek Donor Site for Full-Thickness Skin Graft Repair of the Nasal Ala: Outcomes of a Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) are useful repairs for reconstructing nasal alar defects. Traditional donor sites include the preauricular, postauricular, and supraclavicular skin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate esthetic outcomes and complications of nasal alar defects repaired with FTSGs from the medial cheek. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of Mohs surgery patients who had FTSG repair of the nasal ala between January 2015 and August 2020 was performed. Demographic, surgery, and follow-up visit data were reviewed. Cosmesis was rated by a facial plastic surgeon, a Mohs surgeon, and a plastic surgeon using baseline, defect, and follow-up visit photographs. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients with FTSG repairs of nasal alar defects were identified. 51 of 69 patients (73.9%) had the cheek donor site, and 18 of 69 patients (26.1%) had a noncheek donor site. The mean (SD) rater visual analog score for both cohorts was good with no significant difference (cheek: 65.9 [13.8]; noncheek: 66.1 [15.3]; p = .96). A notable difference in the complication rate by donor site was observed (cheek: 6.9%, noncheek: 16.7%; p = .13), although it did not reach significance. CONCLUSION: The cheek is a reliable FTSG donor site for nasal alar defects after Mohs micrographic surgery, with a trend toward fewer complications.